JSON to TypeScript Type Converter
Paste a JSON object (or JSON array) to automatically generate the corresponding TypeScript interface/type definitions.
Usage tips
- When all elements of an array are objects, their keys are merged into a single interface. Keys missing from some elements are automatically treated as optional (`?`).
- The root type name defaults to "Root", but you can rename it to anything you like (e.g. `User`, `ApiResponse`). Interface names for nested objects are generated automatically from their property names.
- Paste a sample JSON response from your API as-is to quickly get a starting point for the type definitions used in your frontend code.
- The generated output is only a first draft inferred from structure. We recommend reviewing it manually against your actual API spec (nullable fields, required fields, etc.) before relying on it.
Frequently asked questions
Side Note — The "Type Drift" Problem That Type-Inference Tools Solve
TypeScript is a language that lets you catch bugs at compile time thanks to static typing, but the TypeScript compiler has no idea what shape the JSON coming back from an external API takes unless a developer defines it by hand. Every time an API spec and a sample response drift apart, or a field gets added or removed, the type definitions have to be updated manually — and this gap between "what the types say" and "what the API actually returns" has been a recurring headache on many frontend projects.
A JSON-to-TypeScript converter tackles this by working backward from an actual sample JSON response to infer the types mechanically, which speeds up the process considerably. A well-known tool in the same space is quicktype, an open-source project that can generate type definitions for multiple languages and is known for supporting a wide range of input formats, including JSON Schema and GraphQL schemas.
The difficulty with type inference is that JSON itself carries no information about whether a field is always present or might become null in the future. Because of this, auto-generated type definitions are never a complete solution — the standard practice is to treat them as a first draft that reflects only the structure of this particular sample, and to cross-check and adjust them against the real API specification.