Color Blindness Simulator

Free tool that simulates how a color appears to people with protanopia, deuteranopia, or tritanopia (color vision deficiency).

The three types of color vision deficiency

Type Name Characteristics
Protanopia Red-blind (L-cone deficiency) The red-sensing cones function differently, making red and green harder to distinguish.
Deuteranopia Green-blind (M-cone deficiency) The green-sensing cones function differently, making red and green harder to distinguish. The most common type of color vision deficiency.
Tritanopia Blue-blind (S-cone deficiency) The blue-sensing cones function differently, making blue and yellow harder to distinguish. Very rare.

Tips

  • Pick a color with the color picker or type a hex code to instantly see how it looks under protanopia, deuteranopia, and tritanopia.
  • Use this tool before publishing a design to check whether your color palette remains distinguishable for people with color vision deficiency.
  • Red and green combinations are especially hard to tell apart, so it's worth checking charts and maps that rely on this pairing.
  • The simulation is a simplified approximation, so for critical accessibility decisions you should also use dedicated tools and real user testing.

Frequently Asked Questions

Color vision deficiency is a visual trait that makes certain color combinations hard to distinguish. It results from one of the three types of cone cells in the retina (sensitive to red, green, or blue) responding differently than typical, and it is usually inherited. It is estimated to affect about 1 in 20 men and 1 in 500 women of Japanese descent, with similar or higher rates reported worldwide.

No, it is not a medical diagnostic tool. This simulator applies a widely used simplified approximation matrix based on research by Brettel and Viénot, intended for educational and design-review purposes. Actual perception varies between individuals, so an eye exam is needed for an accurate diagnosis.

Protanopia involves the red-sensing cones and deuteranopia involves the green-sensing cones; both make red and green harder to distinguish. Tritanopia involves the blue-sensing cones and is very rare, making blue and yellow harder to distinguish.

Relying on color alone to convey information (for example, showing an error only with red text) can fail to communicate that information to users with color vision deficiency. Checking a simulation in advance and pairing color with icons or text labels results in a design that works for more people.
ツールくん

Side Note — The history of color vision testing and the Ishihara test

Color vision deficiency affects an estimated 1 in 20 men and 1 in 500 women of Japanese descent, and reports suggest roughly 8% of men worldwide are affected. It is far from rare — statistically, there is likely at least one person with this trait in any given classroom or workplace.

The best-known color vision test, the Ishihara Color Test, was devised in 1917 by Japanese ophthalmologist Shinobu Ishihara. Its distinctive plates, which hide numbers or shapes among clusters of colored dots, were originally developed for color vision screening during military conscription exams, and the same design is still used in eye clinics around the world more than a century later.

In web and app design, relying too heavily on color — such as a chart that shows pass or fail only in red and green, or a map that distinguishes routes by color alone — can leave out information for a meaningful share of users. Checking color combinations with a simulation beforehand and pairing them with icons, patterns, or text labels is a basic practice of inclusive design that benefits everyone.